Examining the sanctity of arbitral awards through the Supreme Court’s rejection of modification under Section 34
This article is a continuation of a prior discussion exploring the potential stance of the
Bombay High Court Upholds Arbitrator’s Authority to Permit Withdrawal of Claims, Emphasizes Limited Judicial Intervention
The sanctity of the arbitral process, a cornerstone of modern dispute resolution, rests on the
Comparative Analysis of Arbitrator Bias Standards, Lessons from Singapore’s DJP v DJO Ruling and India’s Dual Approach to Arbitral Fairness
Introduction The decision by the Singapore Court of Appeal in DJP and others v DJO
Analyzing Constitutional Bench’s Impending Judgment on Modifying vs. Setting Aside Arbitral Awards
India’s ascent in the realm of arbitration, anchored by the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996,
Analyzing the evolving jurisprudence surrounding conflict between arbitration agreements and consumer protection laws
The intricate relationship between contractual autonomy and the protective embrace of statutory remedies, particularly within
How Section 23 & First Schedule of LLP Act, with Cox & Kings Doctrine, Led Bombay HC in Kartik Radia Case to Affirm Arbitration Binding Non-Signatory LLPs
Introduction Recently the Bombay High Court in Kartik Radia v. BDO India LLP and Anr.1
The Interplay Between Section 9 and 17 of the Arbitration Act in Granting Interim Relief
The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, serves as a cornerstone for dispute resolution in India,
Understanding Seat and Venue in Arbitration and Its Impact on Jurisdiction in International Commercial Disputes
Introduction The Supreme Court bench comprising Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna and Justices Sanjay Kumar &
