The rules of the Bar Council of India prohibit law firms from advertising and soliciting work through communication in the public domain. This website is meant solely for the purpose of information and not for the purpose of advertising. Kings & Alliance LLP does not intend to solicit clients through this website. We do not take responsibility for decisions taken by the reader based solely on the information provided in the website. By clicking on ‘ENTER’, the visitor acknowledges that the information provided in the website (a) does not amount to advertising or solicitation and (b) is meant only for his/her understanding about our activities and who we are.
By continuing to use this site you consent to the use of cookies on your device as described in our Cookie Policy
SEBI’s Game-Changing Move: Streamlining Co-Investments in Unlisted Securities
Subscribe
Share
4 min well spent
Introduction
The SEBI1, during its 210th Board meeting, on June 18, 2025, charted a new course for India’s financial landscape. With a decisive stroke, SEBI approved a groundbreaking framework for AIF2 to offer co-investment opportunities in unlisted securities. This pivotal decision, following a consultation paper released on May 9, 2025, is set to revolutionize how wealthy investors participate in India’s private markets, fostering greater capital formation for unlisted companies.
A Shift from Complex Routes to Simplified Access
Until now, fund managers seeking to allow high-net-worth individuals and institutions to co-invest alongside their main funds faced a labyrinth of regulatory hurdles. The prevalent method often involved leveraging PMS3 regulations, necessitating double-registration and navigating extensive red tape. SEBI’s new rules dramatically simplify this process, transforming co-investments from a “legal obstacle course” into a more seamless “one-click option.”
The core of this reform introduces the “Co-investment scheme,” a dedicated vehicle under Category I or Category II AIFs designed exclusively for accredited investors. A distinct CIV4 scheme will be launched for each co-investment in an investee company, ensuring transparency while operating with relaxed regulatory requirements compared to other AIF schemes. Importantly, the existing PMS route for co-investment will continue to exist, providing a dual option for investors.
The Evolution of Co-investments: Past Practices vs. New Framework
Feature
Old Framework
New Framework
Regulatory Framework
Convoluted, often required separate PMS entity/ registration.
Integrated within Category I & II AIF framework via “Co-investment scheme”.
Compliance Burden
Higher, involved double-registration (AIF + PMS) and extra red tape.
Less streamlined; often involved complex arrangements.
Separate CIV “sub-fund” for each co-investment opportunity, with its own PAN/accounts.
Accessibility for AIFs
Required managing two distinct regulatory frameworks.
Fund managers won’t need a second license for each co-investment.
Investor Eligibility
Varied, but often complex and tied to PMS regulations.
Exclusively for Accredited Investors meeting specific criteria.
Ease of Execution
More cumbersome, slower dealmaking.
Streamlined, quicker deal execution.
Who Benefits from This Transformative Change?
This regulatory overhaul creates a win-win scenario for several key stakeholders in the Indian financial ecosystem:
Fund Managers (AIFs): Private Equity and Venture Capital funds, operating as Category I or II AIFs, will find it significantly easier to tap their networks of high-net-worth investors. The simplified process means they can raise additional capital for deals without burdensome extra compliance, allowing for increased investment flexibility and quicker deployment of funds.
Accredited Investors: Sophisticated investors, including high-net-worth individuals, family trusts, body corporates, and partnership firms meeting specific financial criteria (e.g., annual income of at least ₹2 crore or net worth of at least ₹7.5 crore for individuals), gain a new, regulated avenue to participate in private equity-style deals. This offers additional investment opportunities, diversification for portfolios, and the potential for higher returns by co-investing directly in high-growth unlisted companies.
Unlisted Companies and Startups: Perhaps the most significant beneficiary, this framework is designed to unlock fresh capital for India’s burgeoning startup and unlisted company ecosystem. With more investment flexibility for wealthy investors, these companies can more easily attract additional funding, fueling innovation, expansion, and ultimately, job creation. SEBI explicitly states the aim is to “support capital formation in unlisted companies.”
Indian Financial Markets and the Economy: By making co-investments more streamlined, SEBI anticipates larger capital flows into high-potential companies. This move deepens the Indian financial markets, promotes innovation, and broadens the “investment track,” contributing to overall economic growth and wealth creation for participants.
Conclusion
SEBI’s decision aligns perfectly with India’s broader ambition for robust financial markets and “ease of doing business.” By integrating co-investments within the AIF umbrella, the regulator is opening a new, structured wealth-creation channel. It’s a bold reform that empowers fund managers to pitch bigger deals and allows accredited investors to participate more directly in the growth stories of unlisted Indian firms. While higher rewards inherently come with higher risks, SEBI’s mandate for transparency and dedicated CIVs for each co-investment helps manage some of these exposures. Co-investors will still need to perform their due diligence, recognizing the inherent volatility of private markets. Nevertheless, this significant regulatory adjustment broadens the landscape of investment opportunities, ensuring that Indian financial regulations continue to bend towards greater innovation and a more robust flow of capital for sustained growth. The message is clear: the Indian private market space is becoming increasingly dynamic and accessible for those with the appetite and means to participate.
Introduction Arbitration serves as a cornerstone of modern commercial practice, offering a private and efficient alternative to traditional litigation. At its heart lies the arbitration agreement, a contractual commitment by parties to resolve their disputes through this mechanism. The interpretation of such agreements is frequently tested, particularly concerning the essential elements that constitute a valid reference to arbitration. The core […]
In this article, we will explore the statutory scheme related to personal guarantors under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). Thereafter, we will examine whether the time period provided under Section 101, after which the moratorium shall cease to have effect, is mandatory or directory. Statutory Scheme An insolvency application against a personal guarantor can be filed either by the […]
In Principal Secretary, Government of Maharashtra & Anr. v. Kshipra Kamlesh Uke & Ors.1, the Supreme Court dismissed a Special Leave Petition (SLP) challenging a judgment of the Bombay High Court in which it was held that the loss of intellectual property falls within the purview of “damage to property” for the purpose of providing relief to victims of atrocities […]