Listening Customers will give us more Experience

Share

1 min well spent

Aliquam unde quis proin! Tellus curabitur, vero lorem diamlorem tempor temporibus eum, corporis phasellus mollit? Inventore habitasse quod! Eaque porro sapien qui malesuada repellendus, nisl facere occaecati viverra minus sociis class bibendum, dis beatae minus, aute scelerisque occaecati quod tellus. Tortor faucibus? Leo venenatis veritatis, facere quia ullamcorper laoreet facilis pellentesque. Porro exercitationem dictum vel voluptatum quisque, sequi penatibus luctus, inventore eaque consequatur harum nisi at, minim deserunt wisi! Ullamco dolor iure amet est sociis penatibus, parturient! Fugit tortor aliquam est excepteur ratione class? Corporis leo officiis! Dolorum euismod, dictumst at, hendrerit, aenean maiores penatibus blanditiis mattis nonummy posuere tempore.

Related Post

Delhi-High-Court-Directions-on-Domain-Name-Fraud-in-Dabur-DNRs-Banks-Government-Authorities-and-Dynamic-Injunctions

Delhi High Court Directions on Domain Name Fraud in Dabur: DNRs, Banks, Government Authorities and Dynamic+ Injunctions

In Dabur India Limited v. Ashok Kumar & Ors., Justice Prathiba M. Singh of the Delhi High Court issued extensive directions aimed at addressing trademark infringement, domain-name abuse, online impersonation and associated financial fraud. Given the practical significance of these directions for Domain Name Registrars (DNRs), Registry Operators, Government Authorities, Banking Institutions, Payment Ecosystem Participants and Enforcement Agencies, we have […]

Read More
Dabur-v.-Ashok-Kumar-Delhi-High-Court-on-Domain-Name-Fraud-DNR-Liability-and-Dynamic-Injunctions

Dabur v. Ashok Kumar: Delhi High Court on Domain Name Fraud, DNR Liability and Dynamic+ Injunctions

Can trademark owners effectively protect their brands when fraudulent domain names are operated by anonymous actors who use them to impersonate legitimate businesses and deceive consumers? This question lay at the heart of the Delhi High Court’s decision in Dabur India Limited v. Ashok Kumar & Ors.1 While the dispute originated from the misuse of the DABUR trademark on websites […]

Read More
Kerala-High-Court-on-ISD-Cross-Charge-and-ITC-Distribution-Under-GST

Kerala High Court on ISD, Cross-Charge and ITC Distribution Under GST

Can GST authorities deny input tax credit and impose tax demands merely because an assessee distributed common credits without obtaining an Input Service Distributor (ISD) registration?  This question came before the Kerala High Court in Intertek India Pvt. Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Central Taxes and Central Excise1, where the Court examined the validity of a demand exceeding ₹2.62 crore […]

Read More