Listening Customers will give us more Experience

Share

1 min well spent

Aliquam unde quis proin! Tellus curabitur, vero lorem diamlorem tempor temporibus eum, corporis phasellus mollit? Inventore habitasse quod! Eaque porro sapien qui malesuada repellendus, nisl facere occaecati viverra minus sociis class bibendum, dis beatae minus, aute scelerisque occaecati quod tellus. Tortor faucibus? Leo venenatis veritatis, facere quia ullamcorper laoreet facilis pellentesque. Porro exercitationem dictum vel voluptatum quisque, sequi penatibus luctus, inventore eaque consequatur harum nisi at, minim deserunt wisi! Ullamco dolor iure amet est sociis penatibus, parturient! Fugit tortor aliquam est excepteur ratione class? Corporis leo officiis! Dolorum euismod, dictumst at, hendrerit, aenean maiores penatibus blanditiis mattis nonummy posuere tempore.

Related Post

Can-an-ECIR-Be-Challenged-Under-Article-226-Despite-Being-an-Internal-Document-Karnataka-High-Court-in-Gameskraft-Technologies-v.-Directorate-of-Enforcement

Can an ECIR Be Challenged Under Article 226 Despite Being an “Internal Document”? Karnataka High Court in Gameskraft Technologies v. Directorate of Enforcement

Can an Enforcement Case Information Report (ECIR) be challenged before a High Court under Article 2261 when the Enforcement Directorate (ED) contends that it is merely an internal administrative document? The Karnataka High Court answered this question in the affirmative in M/s Gameskraft Technologies Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v. Directorate of Enforcement2. The Hon’ble Court rejected the ED’s preliminary objection […]

Read More
Arbitrator-Cannot-Rewrite-Contracts-Bombay-High-Court-Strikes-Down-Interest-Granted-Outside-Partnership-Terms

Arbitrator Cannot Rewrite Contracts: Bombay High Court Strikes Down Interest Granted Outside Partnership Terms

When family ties and commercial ventures interact, contractual boundaries can easily blur. Yet Indian arbitration law leaves little room for such ambiguity: regardless of the informality of parties’ day-to-day dealings, an arbitral award cannot stray beyond the confines of the agreement governing the dispute. Section 28(3) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, draws this statutory boundary by requiring an […]

Read More
Can-Statutory-Building-Plan-Approval-Attract-GST-Karnataka-High-Court-on-Supply-and-Regulatory-Functions

Can Statutory Building-Plan Approval Attract GST? Karnataka High Court on “Supply” and Regulatory Functions

Does the sanctioning of a building plan by a statutory development authority constitute a “supply” of goods or services liable to GST1 merely because the applicant is required to pay charges for obtaining the approval? The Karnataka High Court, in Sai Sravanthi Infra Projects Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Karnataka2, examined whether the Bangalore Development Authority (“BDA”) could collect CGST […]

Read More