The rules of the Bar Council of India prohibit law firms from advertising and soliciting work through communication in the public domain. This website is meant solely for the purpose of information and not for the purpose of advertising. Kings & Alliance LLP does not intend to solicit clients through this website. We do not take responsibility for decisions taken by the reader based solely on the information provided in the website. By clicking on ‘ENTER’, the visitor acknowledges that the information provided in the website (a) does not amount to advertising or solicitation and (b) is meant only for his/her understanding about our activities and who we are.
By continuing to use this site you consent to the use of cookies on your device as described in our Cookie Policy
The Price of Heritage Just Dropped: India’s New GI Rules Unlock the Artisan Economy
Subscribe
Share
3 min well spent
Introduction
The Ministry of Commerce and Industry, through the Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (DPIIT), notified the Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) (Amendment) Rules, 2025, effective November 3, 2025. This is not just a procedural revision; it is a decisive move to modernise, streamline, and most crucially make the entire GI regime accessible.
The 80% Fee Cut: A Policy Game-Changer
The heart of this amendment lies in a radical simplification of the fee structure, replacing the entire First Schedule of the original 2002 Rules. The result is a substantial reduction in costs, which is set to ignite a wave of registrations across the country.
GI Procedure
Old Fee
New Fee
Reduction/Impact
Application for GI Registration (One Class)
₹5,000
₹1,000
80% Reduction
Renewal of GI Registration
₹3,000
₹500
A massive cut for continued protection
Registration of an Authorized User
Varies (e.g. ₹100)
₹10
Minimal cost to empower genuine producers
The most impactful change is the slashing of the application fee for a new GI from ₹5,000 to a mere ₹1,000. Similarly, the fee for renewing a GI registration has plummeted from ₹3,000 to just ₹500. Even registering an “Authorised User”—a vital step that allows individual members of the producer group to legally use the tag—is now priced at a token ₹10.
Empowering the Custodians of Culture
This fee rationalisation is more than an accounting adjustment; it is an act of economic inclusion. Geographical Indication protection is a form of collective intellectual property that is crucial for:
Protecting Rural Artisans: High procedural costs often deter smaller producers, cooperatives, and community-based organizations that represent traditional crafts and agriculture. The lower fees make GI protection viable for them, empowering local industries and generating employment.
Boosting Authenticity: By encouraging more genuine producers to register as authorized users, the system strengthens the legal certainty of the GI mark, protecting consumers from counterfeit or substandard products.
Driving National Vision: This reform directly aligns with the government’s ambitious “Vision 2030” goal, which aims to achieve 10,000 GI registrations across India. By removing the cost barrier, the government is providing a strong impetus to reach this milestone, thereby enhancing India’s cultural economy and export potential.
Conclusion
The Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) (Amendment) Rules, 2025, enacted by the Ministry of Commerce and Industry and effective November 3, 2025, signify a crucial policy shift to democratise the GI regime by radically simplifying its fee structure. The most impactful change is the 80% reduction of the application fee for a new GI, dropping from ₹5,000 to a mere ₹1,000, alongside massive cuts for renewal (from ₹3,000 to ₹500) and the registration of an Authorized User (now a token ₹10). This fee rationalisation transforms GI protection from a costly formality into an accessible tool for economic inclusion, directly empowering small-scale producers and cooperatives who are the custodians of India’s cultural wealth, thereby aligning policy with the ambitious Vision 2030 goal of achieving 10,000 GI registrations.
Introduction Can an improperly secured government allocation, obtained through deception, become the foundation for a money laundering charge years later? This question strikes at the heart of how financial crime legislation treats the “fruits of a poisonous tree.” In a significant development, the Delhi High Court division bench has decisively ruled in Directorate Of Enforcement Versus M/S. Hi-Tech Mercantile India […]
Introduction The bedrock of any equitable legal system rests upon the principles of a fair trial and due process, fundamentally ensuring an accused’s informed participation in their defense. At the core of this lies the undeniable right to access pertinent information collected during an investigation. In a landmark pronouncement, the Supreme Court of India in Sarla Gupta & Another Versus […]
Introduction When does a corporate decision, backed by overwhelming majority approval, cross the line into unfair treatment of minority shareholders? This question lay at the heart of Pannalal Bhansali v. Bharti Telecom Ltd.1, where the dispute arose from a reduction of share capital under Section 66 of the Companies Act2, resulting in the forced exit of minority shareholders at a […]
