Clash over “Desi Chinese”: Delhi HC halts Deceptively Similar “SCHEZWAN CHUTNEY”
Can descriptive and generic culinary terms acquire secondary meaning over time and receive judicial protection
Two Prior Arts, One Obvious Invention: Delhi HC Rejects Esteve’s Tramadol-Celecoxib Co-Crystal Patent
Can two separate prior art documents, neither of which discloses the claimed invention on its
Leading and Essential: Bombay HC Restrains Dabur’s Use of ‘NEEM’ as a Registered Trademark
Can a word that a company never separately registered still be protected as a trade
When Does a Claim Stop Being a Thought? Delhi HC’s Section 3(m) Test
For over two decades, Section 3(m)1 of the Patents Act, 1970 which bars patentability of
Mimicry, not Malice: Calcutta HC draws the line between disparagement and trade mark infringement in the “Balm” dispute
Does citing your trade mark registrations in a plaint automatically turn a disparagement suit into
Beyond Copy-Paste Orders: The Delhi HC Directive on Patent Rejections
In an era where clean technology and green innovations are vital to combating climate change,
Examining the Delhi High Court’s Evolving Approach to Dynamic Injunctions Against Rogue Websites
By the time a court blocks an unauthorised live stream, the match may already be
The USD 1.5 Billion Cost of Pirated Training Data: What Bartz v. Anthropic Means for AI, Fair Use and Copyright
A USD 1.5 billion settlement has brought one of the most consequential copyright disputes in
Delhi High Court on Well-Known Mark Protection under Section 11(2) in ZARA v. ZORA
Sometimes, a trademark dispute turns on a single letter. Here, it was the difference between
Evidentiary Path to Interim Relief in Bata India v. Lalli Devi
Online counterfeiting reaches the courtroom through a chain of proof. The listing identifies the representation