IPR Insights September 2026 – Your Monthly Digest to Stay Ahead in the rapidly Evolving Realm of IPR
Download pdf Share now:
Two Prior Arts, One Obvious Invention: Delhi HC Rejects Esteve’s Tramadol-Celecoxib Co-Crystal Patent
Can two separate prior art documents, neither of which discloses the claimed invention on its
Leading and Essential: Bombay HC Restrains Dabur’s Use of ‘NEEM’ as a Registered Trademark
Can a word that a company never separately registered still be protected as a trade
When Does a Claim Stop Being a Thought? Delhi HC’s Section 3(m) Test
For over two decades, Section 3(m)1 of the Patents Act, 1970 which bars patentability of
Mimicry, not Malice: Calcutta HC draws the line between disparagement and trade mark infringement in the “Balm” dispute
Does citing your trade mark registrations in a plaint automatically turn a disparagement suit into
Examining Limits of Exclusive Ownership and Coparcenary Rights in Family-owned Legacy Brands
Can a trademark, nurtured over decades within the folds of a family enterprise, ever be